Names Of Multiple Celebrities In Epstein Files Revealed After Trump Signs For Files To Be Released

Newly unsealed US court documents reveal that Prince Andrew is mentioned more often than any other UK figure in materials linked to Jeffrey Epstein. The records, released in New York, span hundreds of pages from long-running civil litigation involving Ghislaine Maxwell and reference numerous well-known individuals.

Most of the files consist of interviews, depositions and evidence gathered during Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit against Maxwell. Giuffre has long accused Epstein of trafficking her as a teenager and claims she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew—allegations he firmly denies. The documents do not amount to criminal charges but show how frequently his name appeared in testimonies.

Reports note that Andrew’s name surfaces in flight logs, witness accounts and descriptions of events in London, New York and the Caribbean. Though many details vary, he is the most referenced British individual in the cache.

The unsealing follows a judge’s decision that much of the Giuffre case record should be made public. While many names remain hidden, dozens are now identifiable. For Andrew—who already lost royal duties over his Epstein ties—the files mainly reinforce information previously known.

Prince Andrew’s relationship with Epstein drew intense scrutiny after the financier’s 2019 arrest and death. A photo of Andrew with Giuffre at Maxwell’s London home became central to public discussion, though he denies knowing her and questions aspects of the image.

His 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, meant to address the accusations, was widely criticized and led to him stepping back from public life. He later settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit in 2022 without admitting wrongdoing.

The newly released material revisits earlier claims, with witnesses placing him at Epstein properties or social events, though some accounts acknowledge memory gaps or lack of direct allegations. His prominence in the files reflects how often his name appeared rather than any new legal conclusions.