us 5 min(s) read Trump labeled ‘disgrace

Video of Renee Nicole Good’s final seconds—unsteady and deeply disturbing—has become a flashpoint across the country. For many in Minneapolis, what it shows feels unmistakable.

The footage appears to capture a frightened woman trying to escape as ICE agents confront her. One officer opens her car door, another lifts his gun, and a single shot is fired, killing her and sending the vehicle drifting into a parked car.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey responded with visible emotion, flatly rejecting any claim of self-defense. He called for ICE to leave the city, accusing the agency of causing deaths and tearing families apart.

Former President Donald Trump quickly offered a sharply different version of events. Posting on Truth Social, he labeled Good a dangerous aggressor and “professional agitator,” portraying the ICE agent as a victim of extremist violence.

The Department of Homeland Security reinforced that framing, describing the shooting as a justified response to “domestic terrorism” and defending the officer’s actions.

Online and in public discourse, sorrow and anger clashed with calls for strict law enforcement. Communities split between mourning a life lost and backing the authority of the state.

At the center of it all remains an unresolved moral question: when someone is killed by government force in public view, who controls the narrative—and who decides what that death ultimately represents?