Disbarred In DISGRACE – Trump Finally

Trump’s appeal goes beyond challenging a guilty verdict; it directly targets the legal basis of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution.

His legal team argues that the case was presented as a groundbreaking felony matter but was, at its core, an ordinary dispute over a nondisclosure agreement.

They contend that Bragg elevated minor bookkeeping violations into serious crimes by tying them to an unclear and never formally established “second crime.”

According to the appeal, this maneuver crossed constitutional boundaries and transformed criminal law into a tool for political advantage rather than justice.

Trump’s supporters view the filing as a long-overdue counterattack against a system they believe celebrated each indictment, public appearance, and damaging headline.

They also point to what they see as irony, noting that some Democrats now warn about “retaliation” as similar legal scrutiny begins to affect their own side.

If the court concludes that Bragg’s legal theory was driven by partisanship, the ruling would do more than overturn the case—it would serve as a cautionary example of how far politically motivated prosecutions can stretch before collapsing.