CONTROVERSIAL FEDERAL WORKER BUYOUT PLAN SPARKS NATIONAL DEBATE

The Trump administration has introduced a new federal buyout initiative called the “deferred resignation program,” offering nearly 2 million civilian employees full pay and benefits until September—if they choose to resign by February 6.

This move is being presented as a strategy to reduce government spending and increase in-person attendance, as only 6% of federal workers in Washington, D.C. are currently showing up at the office.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the program, rejecting claims that it’s a political purge. She described the policy as a practical, cost-saving decision focused on improving efficiency.

Supporters of the initiative believe it’s a bold and necessary step toward streamlining the federal workforce and adapting it to modern demands.

However, critics, including labor union leaders, argue that the plan may undermine public services. They fear it will push experienced career employees to leave under the appearance of voluntary resignation.

Some worry the program could quietly force out federal workers by presenting a financially attractive but ultimately harmful choice, weakening institutional knowledge and long-term capacity.

With passionate opinions on both sides, the impact of this policy may significantly reshape how public service operates in the United States going forward.